Plan your time on Paper 1, recognise the short question shapes that recur, and write down enough working that the GDC's answers earn every mark.
Paper 1 is a set of compulsory short-response questions spread across the whole course. Each question has one context and between one and five parts, and the paper tests breadth: a typical session moves from a sequence to a triangle, a hypothesis test, a derivative and a loan in the space of an hour and a half. Because the questions are short, the marks are lost in small ways: a misread part, a missing line of working, an answer rounded too early or left in calculator notation.
A graphic display calculator is allowed on the whole paper, as it is on every Applications and interpretation paper. That changes what the paper rewards. Most of the arithmetic is done by the calculator, so the marks go to choosing the right method, setting it up correctly, writing down what was entered and giving the answer in the right form. The skills that follow apply to Paper 1 at both levels; HL Paper 1 is longer and its later questions use HL topics, but the shapes and the habits are the same.
The overview of the assessment gives the duration and total marks of each paper. On Paper 1 those numbers set a pace of a little over a minute per mark, and that pace shapes almost every decision in the paper.
A Paper 1 question starts with a short stem: a sentence or two of context, sometimes a diagram or table, and often a function or model. The parts that follow are labelled (a), (b), (c) and so on, each with its marks in square brackets. In the five SL Paper 1s set in 2021 and 2022, every paper had 13 questions, and the totals per question ran from 4 to 9 marks, with 6 the most common value. Individual parts are worth 1 to 5 marks.
Each part opens with a command term, a word such as "write down", "find" or "show that" that tells you what kind of answer is wanted and how much working to show. Recognising the command term before reading the rest of the sentence is the single most useful reading habit on Paper 1, because it tells you whether the answer is a single extracted value or a method with stages.
The full list of command terms, with what each one demands, is on the "Command terms" page of Exam skills. On Paper 1 four of them do most of the work: "write down" (usually 1 mark, no working needed), "find" and "calculate" (a method with stages), and "show that" (a given result reached by working forwards).
Paper 1 questions fall into a small number of shapes. Knowing the shape on the first read lets you plan the whole question before writing anything.
Shape | What the parts ask | Typical marks |
|---|---|---|
A model given as a function | Write down a parameter or the initial value; find a maximum, a zero or an intersection on the GDC; interpret the answer in context | 5–7 |
A sequence in context | Write down the first term and the common difference or ratio; show that a term has a given value; find a sum or the first term to pass a target | 5–7 |
A hypothesis test from a table | Write down the hypotheses and the degrees of freedom; show that an expected frequency is correct; write down the p-value; state a conclusion with a reason | 6–8 |
Finance with the TVM solver | Find a final value, a payment or a number of periods; give money to the stated accuracy | 5–7 |
A triangle or a solid | Find a side or angle with the sine or cosine rule; find an area or a volume; give units | 5–7 |
Differentiation | Differentiate; find the gradient at a point; find the equation of a tangent or normal in a stated form | 5–7 |
A probability setting | Complete a tree diagram or a table; find a probability; find an expected number | 4–7 |
The questions are not all the same difficulty. Questions near the start of the paper tend to be routine, and the last three or four questions usually contain at least one part that needs an idea rather than a technique. Within a question, the first part is almost always the easiest, often a 1-mark "write down".
Questions come from all five topics of the course, though not every subtopic appears in every session. The table counts the 65 questions on the five SL Paper 1s of 2021 and 2022 by the main topic of each question, next to each topic's share of SL teaching time.
Topic | Questions | Share of questions | Share of SL teaching time |
|---|---|---|---|
1 Number and algebra | 8 | 12% | 13% |
2 Functions | 15 | 23% | 26% |
3 Geometry and trigonometry | 15 | 23% | 15% |
4 Statistics and probability | 17 | 26% | 30% |
5 Calculus | 10 | 15% | 16% |
Source: IB questionbank, Mathematics: applications and interpretation SL Paper 1, May 2021 to May 2022 (five papers); each question counted once by its main topic.
The shares of questions follow the teaching time closely, with geometry and trigonometry slightly over-represented because triangles, solids and Voronoi diagrams make natural short questions. Statistics and probability is the largest topic on the paper. Within it, hypothesis testing (subtopic 4.11) and probability (4.5 and 4.6) appear most often, followed by statistical diagrams (4.2) and the normal distribution (4.9). Many questions also combine two topics, for example a function model whose maximum is found by differentiation, or a geometric sequence set in a finance context.
SL Paper 1 has 80 marks in 90 minutes, which is 1.125 minutes per mark. HL Paper 1 has 110 marks in 120 minutes, about 1.09 minutes per mark. The working rule at both levels is about a mark a minute, with the spare time saved for checking and for the harder final questions.
The marks on a question are therefore a time budget. A 6-mark question deserves about 6 or 7 minutes. If it has taken 10 minutes and the answer is still not in sight, the best move is to write down whatever method you have, leave a gap and come back at the end.
Marks on the question | Time budget (SL) | Time budget (HL) |
|---|---|---|
4 | 4 min 30 s | 4 min 22 s |
6 | 6 min 45 s | 6 min 33 s |
8 | 9 min | 8 min 44 s |
80 (whole SL paper) | 90 min | – |
110 (whole HL paper) | – | 120 min |
The marks on a part also show how much work it needs. A 1-mark part is answered in one line. A 2-mark part is usually one method step and an answer, often marked (M1)A1. A 4- or 5-mark part has several stages, and the marks are spread across them. If the answer to a 1-mark part needs half a page, the question has probably been misread.
Questions are compulsory, so every one must be attempted, but they need not be answered in order. A common plan is one steady pass through the paper in order, answering everything that goes smoothly and marking anything left unfinished, followed by a second pass on the marked parts. Skipping is especially useful for "show that" parts: if a "show that" part cannot be done, the given result can still be used in the next part, so the rest of the question is not lost.
Since the calculator finds most numerical answers, it is tempting to write only the answer. That is safe only when the answer is right. Markschemes give two kinds of method mark: implied marks, printed in brackets as (M1) or (A1), which are awarded automatically when the final answer is correct, and unbracketed marks, M1 or A1, which need the working to be seen. A correct answer with no working earns the bracketed marks but none of the unbracketed ones. A wrong answer with no working earns nothing at all.
The safest habit is to write one line that shows what was given to the calculator, then the unrounded result, then the final answer. It costs a few seconds and protects marks whenever the answer is wrong. It also lets a correct method earn follow-through marks in later parts.
What the GDC did | What to write down |
|---|---|
Solved an equation | The equation, as entered: |
Found a maximum, minimum or intersection on a graph | The function(s) graphed and the feature found; a small labelled sketch if it helps |
Solved a system of equations | The equations, with variables defined |
Used the finance (TVM) solver | Every entry: N, I%, PV, PMT, FV, P/Y, C/Y |
Calculated a probability | The distribution with its parameters and the probability found: , |
Ran a hypothesis test | The test named, the statistic or p-value, the comparison with the significance level |
Found a regression line | The regression type and the equation in the question's variables |
The GDC skills behind each row, with the menus on common models, are on the "Using the GDC" page of Exam skills. The rules for accuracy, rounding and notation are on "Accuracy, notation and setting out".
On a calculator paper the method mark is usually for the set-up: the equation formed, the system written, the distribution chosen, the integral with its limits. That is where the mathematics is, and it is what the examiner needs to see. A question that says "find the number of tickets of each type sold" earns most of its marks for writing three correct equations; pressing the solver earns very little on its own.
Defining variables is part of the set-up. Writing "let be the price of a tea in dollars" before the equations takes seconds and makes every later line readable. Use the letters the question uses; if the question calls the time , do not switch to because the calculator does.
The questions that follow are written in the style of Paper 1, with markscheme-style solutions. The marks show where credit is given.
Part (a) is a "write down" because the launch height is the value of at , which is the constant term. Parts (b) to (d) are all GDC parts, and in each the method mark is for the equation or the graph. In part (d) both intersections must be found from unrounded values: subtracting the rounded values 4.78 and 1.22 gives 3.56, which is wrong to 3 significant figures.
The next question uses a system of equations, one of the commonest set-ups on the paper.
The three marks in part (a) are for the set-up alone, which is typical. If one equation in (a) is wrong, part (b) can still earn follow-through marks for solving the candidate's own system correctly, which is only possible if the system is written down.
Statistics is the largest topic on the paper, and the chi-squared test is one of its most frequent shapes. Its parts are short and mostly "write down", so the marks depend on exact wording. The next question is based on a hypothetical survey of 150 students, whose results are shown by year group.
Library | Home | Café | |
|---|---|---|---|
Year 12 | 28 | 35 | 12 |
Year 13 | 18 | 40 | 17 |
Part (c) shows how a "show that" works on a calculator paper. The answer 23 is given, so writing "23" earns nothing; the mark is for the calculation that produces it, row total times column total divided by the grand total. Part (d) is worth 2 marks for a single number because the whole test is done on the GDC, and the mark is for the right test with the right data. In part (e) the reason (the comparison of the p-value with 5%) earns the R1, and the conclusion without it earns nothing.
Finance questions on Paper 1 are short and almost always use the TVM solver, so the marks depend on the entries and on the rounding the question asks for.
Part (b) needs care with the context. The solver gives about 11.28 years, but the value only exceeds $12,000 during the 12th year: after 11 complete years it is $11,879.91 and after 12 it is $12,314.71. "Complete years" means the answer is rounded up, not to the nearest whole number. The sign convention (money paid in is entered as negative, money received as positive) and the full entries are taught in subtopic 1.4, Financial applications of geometric sequences.
Many of the marks lost on Paper 1 come from a small number of habits, and the examiners' reports for this course return to the same ones each session.
Answers in calculator notation are a related loss. A value displayed as 1.14E10 must be written as ; calculator notation can imply a method mark but never earns the accuracy mark. The same applies to typing syntax such as binomcdf(20,0.3,4) in place of a probability statement.
Units and context are the last of the common losses. Give units with every answer that has them (m, s, , $), and make sure the answer is possible in context: a number of people is a whole number, a probability is between 0 and 1, and a time cannot be negative.
The first read of a question should take about 20 seconds: identify the shape, underline the command term of each part and the accuracy asked for, and note which parts depend on earlier ones. A part that depends on an earlier answer is the place where a "show that" or a given value lets you continue even if the earlier part went wrong.
At the end of the paper, the most valuable checks are fast ones: is every part attempted, is every final answer to 3 significant figures (or the accuracy asked for), are units there, and has every negative or impossible root been rejected? Re-doing long calculations is a poor use of the last few minutes.
Paper 1 is a set of compulsory short questions on one context each, 13 questions on SL papers, usually 4–9 marks each, covering every topic.
The command term at the start of each part sets the kind of answer and the working needed; "write down" needs none, "find" and "calculate" need stages.
Budget about a mark a minute (1.125 min per mark at SL, about 1.09 at HL); skip a stalled part and return to it.
Most method marks are for the set-up: the equation, system, distribution, TVM entries or test, written down before the GDC answer.
Bracketed marks are implied by a correct answer; unbracketed marks need the working seen; a wrong answer with no working earns nothing.
Keep full values in the GDC, round only final answers, and never leave calculator notation.
Read the last sentence of each part for the accuracy, form and counting instruction.
Statistics and probability is the largest topic on SL Paper 1, with geometry and trigonometry and functions close behind.
I can name the command term of a part and say how much working it needs.
I can recognise the common Paper 1 shapes from the stem and plan the GDC tool for each part.
I can work out a time budget for any question from its marks.
I can write the set-up line the markscheme expects for an equation, a system, a TVM calculation, a probability and a test.
I can explain the difference between (M1) and M1 in a markscheme.
I can reject an impossible root and say why in a few words.
I can round correctly for "complete years", "nearest dollar" and "3 significant figures".
I can convert a calculator display such as 3.2E−4 into correct notation.
With a free account, Augment remembers where you stopped in the notes and which questions you have marked.