Split a fraction with two distinct linear factors in the denominator into partial fractions, by substitution or by equating coefficients, and use them for series expansions and sums.
Each is in the Maths AA glossary, with every other term in the subject.
A quick way to find a partial fraction numerator: substitute the value of that makes one linear factor zero into the rest of the fraction, with that factor covered up.
Setting the coefficients of each power of on the two sides of an identity equal to each other, to find unknown constants.
An algebraic fraction whose numerator has a degree greater than or equal to that of its denominator, such as
With a free account, Augment remembers where you stopped and what you have practiced.
Simpler fractions whose sum equals a given algebraic fraction, for example .
An algebraic fraction whose numerator has a lower degree than its denominator, such as .
A series whose terms can be written as differences, so that most of them cancel when added and only a few terms at the start and end remain.
Adding two fractions such as and gives a single fraction,
The simpler fractions are much easier to work with. Each has a denominator that is a single linear factor, so it can be integrated directly, expanded as a binomial series, or cancelled against neighbouring terms in a long sum. Partial fractions are a tool rather than an end in themselves, and they reappear in integration (5.15) and in work on rational functions (2.13).
An algebraic fraction has a polynomial in its numerator and in its denominator, such as ; it is a rational function written as a fraction. Just as numerical fractions are classified as proper (
The methods for partial fractions apply directly to proper fractions only. An improper fraction is first written as a polynomial plus a proper fraction, in the same way that .
Adding fractions with linear denominators uses a common denominator.
The result is always a proper fraction: the numerator is linear (or constant) and the denominator is quadratic. Reversing this addition is the aim of the subtopic.
The symbol shows that the two sides form an identity: they are equal for every value of for which both sides are defined, not only for particular solutions. Every method for finding partial fractions depends on this.
For a proper fraction with two distinct linear factors in the denominator, the partial fractions have constant numerators.
The numerators are constants because of the degrees involved. Recombining gives the numerator
Multiplying both sides of the identity by removes every fraction and gives a polynomial identity:
There are two ways to find and from this identity: substituting convenient values of , and equating coefficients.
The polynomial identity holds for every value of , so any value can be substituted. The best values make one of the brackets zero, which removes one unknown at a time. Choosing
The substitutions and are values at which the original fraction is undefined, which can seem surprising. They are substituted into the polynomial identity
The substitution method has a well-known shortcut. To find the numerator over a factor, cover up that factor in the original fraction and substitute the value of that makes the covered factor zero into what remains. This is the cover-up method.
For , covering and substituting
Two polynomials are identically equal only if the coefficients of each power of are equal. Expanding the right-hand side of and matching coefficients gives a pair of simultaneous equations for
Fractional constants are common. Writing as
Both methods always work for two distinct linear factors, and they can be mixed: one substitution to find , then a single coefficient comparison to find .
Method | Steps | Best when |
|---|---|---|
Substitution (cover-up) | Substitute the root of each factor into the identity | The roots are simple numbers; fastest in most cases |
Equating coefficients | Expand, match coefficients of and the constant, solve | The roots are awkward fractions, or as a second method to check |
Often the denominator is given as a quadratic, not as a product. Factorise it first; the methods then apply as before. A difference of two squares, , is a common case.
A constant numerator is still a proper fraction: its degree, 0, is less than the degree of the denominator. The method is unchanged, with .
The most complete check is to add the partial fractions back together and compare with the original fraction. For the previous answer:
which is the original fraction. Recombining takes a few lines and confirms both constants at once, so it is worth doing whenever time allows.
Recombining also answers questions that run the process backwards, where the partial fractions are given and the original fraction contains unknown constants.
The bracket around in matters: the subtraction applies to the whole numerator of the second fraction, giving and not
When the degree of the numerator is not less than the degree of the denominator, the fraction is improper, and the form
The constant 1 in the answer is the horizontal asymptote of the graph of the original function, a link explored for rational functions in 2.13.
Near each vertical asymptote, one partial fraction becomes very large while the other stays bounded. The behaviour of the whole function close to that asymptote is therefore controlled by a single partial fraction. The graph shows , equal to
A fraction with a linear denominator integrates to a natural logarithm, so a split into partial fractions turns an integral that has no standard form into two that do. For example,
This is the most common use of partial fractions; it is developed fully in 5.15.
Each partial fraction can be expanded with the extended binomial theorem of 1.10, and the two expansions added. Expanding the original fraction directly would mean multiplying two infinite series together, which is longer and more error-prone.
A sum such as looks difficult, but partial fractions give

As increases, approaches 0, so the infinite series
Partial fractions questions are usually short first parts that set up a longer "hence" part: an integral, a series expansion or the sum of a series. The decomposition must be right, because everything after it depends on it.
A sum of series question follows the same pattern, with the cancellation set out clearly.
I can decide whether an algebraic fraction is proper or improper.
I can write down the correct form
23 exam-style questions on this subtopic, written in the style of the IB papers. The first has its markscheme open. Counted on
Let , for .
Express in partial fractions.
3 marks
Let
This question compares the sums
One of 26 short multiple-choice questions on 1.11. Pick an answer to see why it's right or wrong.
The diagram shows the graph of , with its vertical asymptotes dashed. What are and ?

Multiply through by .
Substitute to remove : , so .
Substitute to remove : , so .
For : the factor is zero when . Cover it up and substitute into the rest.
For : the factor is zero when .
Expand the right-hand side and group by powers of .
Equate the coefficients of and the constant terms.
Subtracting the first equation from the second gives , so and .
: , so .
: , so .
: , so .
: , so .
Check at : the left side is , and the right side is .
Combine the right-hand side over the common denominator .
The denominators are the same, so the numerators are identically equal: . Equating coefficients gives and .
Now split the proper fraction, with .
: , so . : , so .
(b) State the values of for which the expansion is valid.
(a) From earlier, . Write each part in the form .
For the second part, take out from the denominator:
Add the two expansions, collecting each power of .
Check: at the fraction is
(b) The first expansion is valid for and the second for
(a) . Substituting gives , so ; substituting gives , so .
(b) Write out the first and last terms of the sum.
Every term except the first and the last cancels.
As , , so the sum to infinity is 1.
Check with : the sum is the single term
(b) Hence find the expansion of in ascending powers of , up to and including the term in . [5 marks]
(c) State the values of for which this expansion is valid. [1 mark]
(a) .
: , so . : , so .
(b) Expand each part with the extended binomial theorem.
Add the two expansions.
Check:
(c) The first expansion is valid for and the second for , that is,
(b) Hence show that . [5 marks]
(c) Find the value of . [2 marks]
(a) Combine the right-hand side over a common denominator.
(b) Write out terms at the start and the end of the sum.
Each negative part cancels with a positive part two terms later. The positive parts and have nothing before them to cancel, and the negative parts
Combine over the common denominator .
(c) As , and
I can find and by substitution, by the cover-up method and by equating coefficients.
I can factorise a quadratic denominator before splitting a fraction.
I can check a decomposition by recombining or by substituting a value of .
I can divide first to deal with an improper fraction.
I can use partial fractions with the extended binomial theorem to expand a fraction, and state where the expansion is valid.
I can use partial fractions to sum a telescoping series and find its sum to infinity.
: A1
: A1
Hence find , giving your answer in the form , where .
3 marks
A1FT
Express in partial fractions.
3 marks
Find the value of and the value of .
2 marks
Given that , suggest an expression for
Prove by mathematical induction that your expression for is correct for all .
6 marks
Find the least value of for which .
3 marks
Show that , for .
2 marks
Hence prove by mathematical induction that
Hence explain why
Show that
Hence prove by mathematical induction that
Hence find a value of for which
A1
1 mark
6 marks
1 mark
2 marks
5 marks
2 marks